In 1580, French writer Michel Montaigne created a literary genre with
the publication of his Essais. Montaigne's work is a collection
of over 100 musings on a variety of subjects, including "Of Idleness",
"Of Liars", "Of Fear", "Of Friendship", and "Of Cannibals". After Montaigne,
hundreds of collections of essays appeared by noted writers such as Francis
Bacon, John Dryden, Alexander Pope, Joseph Addison, and Samuel Johnson.
Although some writers published formal essays that might be better termed
"treatises", the quintessential essay was informal, personal and, above
all, entertaining. In 1741 Hume published his Essays, Moral and Political
in which he consciously followed the tried and true model of informal essay
writing. Part of Hume's motivation for producing a collection of informal
essays stems from the poor public reception of his more formally written
Treatise of Human Nature (1739-1740). In his essay "Of Essay Writing",
Hume expresses his hope that his own collection of essays would be of interest
both to learned people and conversational people. In the opening section
of his first Enquiry (1748, first titled Philosophical Essays),
Hume argues that essays are a good forum for discussing common life philosophy
- in contrast to abstract philosophy. From 1741 until his death, Hume continually
added to his collection of essays, which, from various editions, totaled
47 different compositions. As time when on, Hume's essay writing became
more formal, both in style and content, and Hume even removed some of the
earlier essays that he thought were too frivolous. The subjects of Hume's
essays are as diverse as those by Montaigne or Addison. However, the bulk
of Hume's essays fall into one of three distinct subject groups: aesthetic
theory, political theory, and economic theory.
Table of Contents (Clicking on the links below will take you to those parts of this article)
1. Hume's Place in Early Aesthetic, Political, and Economic Theory
To better understand Hume's contributions to aesthetic, political, and
economic theory, it is helpful to examine the context in which Hume developed
his views. Concerning aesthetic theory, several of Hume's essays discuss
issues such as taste, cultural refinement, oratorical eloquence, essay
writing, and aesthetic pleasure derived from artistic depictions of tragedy.
During the 18th century, most of these issues were addressed
in books on rhetoric, which laid out the principles of good writing and
good speaking. Hume's principal contribution in this arena concerns his
theory of taste. In 18th century discussions, the term "taste"
referred to a mental faculty that enables people to appreciate and critically
judge aesthetic objects. Theorists on this topic described both the instinctive
mental mechanisms of this faculty, and how we refine our judgments of taste
through experience. The expression "delicacy of taste", which Hume often
uses, refers to a refinement of this faculty, which gives a person a greater
and more subtle range of experiences. In An Inquiry into the Original
of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (1725), Francis Hutcheson described
the taste mechanism as an internal sense of beauty that produces pleasure
when we are presented with objects "in which there is uniformity amidst
variety." For Hutcheson, this includes objects in nature, artistic representations,
and even mathematical theorems.
Hume's essay "Of the Standard of Taste" appeared in 1757. Although paralleling
Hutcheson's account, Hume parts company with Hutcheson in two important
ways. First, Hume does not discuss the psychological details of the taste
mechanism, and Hume even leaves it open as to whether the sense of taste
is an internal or external sense. Second, unlike Hutcheson who offers a
criterion of beauty, namely, form of purposeness, Hume does not specify
any criterion. Shortly after the appearance of Hume's essay, Alexander
Gerard published his Essay on Taste (1759). In this work Gerard
presents a detailed account of the different kinds of internal senses,
and also distinguishes between several types of taste senses. At the close
of the century, in his Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste
(1790), Archibald Alison developed an even more detailed psychological
account of the various mental mechanisms involved in taste. Hume's theory
stands in contrast to both Gerard's and Allison's insofar as Hume minimises
reliance on psychological faculties and mechanisms.
As to political theory, Hume's essays on this subject deal with popular
political controversies of the time, particularly involving party disputes
between Whigs and Tories. The Whig and Tory parties of England date from
1679 when the House of Commons tried to exclude the Roman Catholic duke
of York (later James II) from succeeding to throne, currently held by the
duke's older brother Charles II. Charles supported his younger brother
as successor, which ultimately required Charles to dissolve Parliament
in 1681. During this time, Scottish Presbyterian rebels formed the Whig
party in opposition to Charles. The Tory party, by contrast, emerged as
a party that gave loyal support to the King. In 1685, Charles died and
his brother succeeded to the throne as James II. After advocating several
pro-Catholic policies, the Whig party instigated James's overthrow in the
Glorious Revolution of 1688. In later years the Whigs justified the revolution
by appealing to Locke's theory that people can remove political authorities
when those authorities fail to protect the rights of the people. Accordingly,
the newly empowered Whig party supported constitutional government. Their
Tory counterparts ultimately accepted much of the Whig's constitutionalist
position and, after 1714, the Tories declined as a political force.
In Hume's political essays, two consistent themes emerge. First, in
securing peace, a monarchy with strong authority is probably better than
a pure republic. Consequently, Hume sides with the Tories, given their
traditional support of the monarchy. Except in extreme cases, Hume opposes
the Lockean argument offered by Whigs that justifies overthrowing political
authorities. Hume does note, though, that monarchies and republics each
have their strong points. Monarchies encourage the arts, and republics
encourage science and trade. Hume also appreciates the mixed form of government
within Great Britain, which fosters liberty of the press. The second theme
in Hume's political essays is that revolutions and civil wars principally
arise from zealousness within party factions. Political moderation, he
argues, is the best antidote to potentially ruinous party conflict.
Turning finally to economic theory, in ancient and medieval writings,
economics was not an isolated discipline, but part of a larger moral, religious,
and political quest to optimally organise society. For example, in Book
I of the Politics, Aristotle discusses the art of acquiring wealth,
which he argues is a necessary part of households; and households, for
Aristotle, comprise the state. Views about economics changed during the
Renaissance when individual autonomous states actively sought to increase
their wealth. The mercantile system emerged based on the concept
of the "balance of trade", the view that a country increases its wealth
by increasing the quantity of gold and silver in that country. Three means
were commonly employed to this end: (1) capture gold, silver and raw material
from other countries through colonisation; (2) discourage imports through
tariffs and monopolies, which keeps acquired gold and silver within one's
country's borders; and, (3) increase exports, which brings in money from
outside countries. In Great Britain, mercantile policies were instituted
through the Navigation Acts, which prohibited trade between British colonies
and foreign countries. These protectionist laws ultimately led to the American
revolution.
During the late 17th through mid 18th centuries,
several writers chiselled away at the central doctrines of mercantilism.
The most notable of these were a group of French economists known as physiocrats
-- a term which means rule of nature as opposed to human rule. In
opposition to mercantilists who held that wealth was gold, the physiocrats
argued that all economic production was based on sound agriculture. Also,
contrary to the mercantilists' protectionist policies, the physiocrats
believed that a country's economy would naturally and automatically attain
optimal results when people do not interfere with its operation. This is
the basis of the term laissez-faire, which means "let it be". This
aspect of the physiocrats directly influenced Adam Smith in his Wealth
of Nations (1776). A leading proponent of the physiocrat school was
Anne Robert Jacques Turgot (1727-1781) who was minister of finance in France
from 1774-1776, during which time he unsuccessfully tried to institute
physiocratic reforms. Hume and Turgot were friends and the two frequently
corresponded on economic issues in the late 1760s.
In 1752, Hume published a series of economic essays in his Political
Discourses, which, like the writing of the physiocrats, makes a decisive
turn away from mercantilist theory. The most famous of Hume's anti-mercantilist
arguments is now called Hume's gold-flow theory. Contrary to mercantilists
who advocated locking up money in one's home country, Hume argued that
increased money in one country automatically disperses to other countries.
Suppose, for example, that Great Britain receives an influx of new money.
This new money will drive up prices of labour and domestic products in
Great Britain. Products in foreign countries, then, will be cheaper than
in Great Britain; Britain, then, will import these products, thereby sending
new money to foreign countries. Hume compares this reshuffling of wealth
to the level of fluids in interconnected chambers: if I add fluid to one
chamber, then, under the weight of gravity, this will disperse to the others
until the level is the same in all chambers. A similar phenomenon will
occur if we lose money in our home country by purchasing imports
from foreign countries. As the quantity of money decreases in our home
country, this will drive down the prices of labour and domestic products.
Our products, then, will be cheaper than foreign products, and we will
gain money through exports. On the fluid analogy, by removing fluid from
one chamber, more fluid is drawn in from surrounding chambers.
In 1755 a posthumously published work appeared by Irishman Richard Cantillion
(1680-1734), titled Essai sur la Nature du Commerce. Though explained
less precisely, Cantillion offered a gold-flow theory similar to Hume's.
In fact, some of Cantillions observations were so similar to Hume's that,
in a review of Cantillion's work - apparently unaware of Cantillion's death
date - William Kenrick writes that Cantillon frequently "quotes Mr. Hume
in justification of his own sentiments; but does not appear always to comprehend
the arguments, or see clearly into the design of that masterly writer."
Although Adam Smith cites Cantillion in the Wealth of Nations (1776),
Cantillion's work was largely forgotten until the late 19th
century. Consequently it is Hume's name that is associated with the gold-flow
theory.
2. Summary of the Essays
The chronology behind Hume's collected essays is complex and only a
general outline can be given here. The essays were published in different
volumes during a period of over 35 years. The original sources of the published
essays are these:
Essays, Moral and Political (abbr. EMP)
Vol. 1 first edition (1741)
Vol. 1 second edition (1742)
Vol. 2 first edition (1742)
Combined third edition (1748)
Combined fourth edition (1753, in Essays and Treatises on Several
Subjects)
Political Discourses (abbr. PD)
First edition (1752)
Second edition (1752)
Second edition (1753, in Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects)
Third edition (1754)
Third edition (1754, in Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects)
Four Dissertations (abbr. FD)
Only edition (1757)
Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary (abbr. EMPL; in Essays
and Treatises on Several Subjects)
Eight editions: 1758, 1760, 1764, 1767, 1768, 1770, 1772, 1777
In 1758 Hume compiled his essays into a two-part collection titled Essays,
Moral, Political, and Literary. Part I includes the essays from Essays,
Moral and Political, plus two essays from Four Dissertations.
The contents of this part largely covers political and aesthetic issues.
Part II includes the essays from Political Discourses, most of which
develop economic themes. The total two-part collection appeared within
a larger collection of Hume's writings titled Essays and Treatises on
Several Subjects. Below is a brief description of the content and bibliographical
history of the Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary.
PART 1
1. Of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion. This first appeared
as essay 1 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741). In this essay Hume distinguishes between
(1) delicacy of passion, which makes people sensitive to life's joys and
sorrows, and (2) delicacy of taste, which makes people sensitive to the
arts. Hume argues that delicacy of taste helps improve delicacy of passion.
2. Of the Liberty of the Press. This first appeared as essay
2 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741). In this essay Hume argues that the liberty of
the press in Great Britain owes to its mixed form of government "which
is neither wholly monarchical, nor wholly republican."
3. That Politics may be reduced to a Science. This first appeared
as essay 4 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741). In this essay Hume argues that there
is a real difference between different forms of government and that "an
hereditary prince, a nobility without vassals, and a people voting by their
representatives, form the best MONARCHY, ARISTOCRACY and DEMOCRACY." Hume
discourages political zeal and recommends moderation when a constitution
is fundamentally good.
4. Of the First Principles of Government. This first appeared
as essay 5 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741). In this essay Hume argues that governments
are founded primarily on (1) opinion concerning public interest, and (2)
opinion concerning rights to power and property. Other foundational principles
are self-interest concerning rewards, fear of a tyrant's fury, and affection
for a sovereign's wisdom and virtue.
5. Of the Origin of Government. This first appeared as essay
5 in EMPL (1777). In this essay Hume argues that the aim of all government
is to maintain justice. We recognise the need for justice in securing peace,
but human weakness keeps us from always acting justly. We thus institute
a government and invent the duty of obedience. Although such authority
is essential to society, it is always balanced against liberty.
6. Of the Independency of Parliament. This first appeared as
essay 8 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741). In this essay Hume argues that party loyalty
makes people despise their adversaries. Accordingly, government powers
should be divided with checks on each other. Hume notes that the British
Parliament has an imbalance of checks, since the House of Lords requires
support from the King to be effective. However, the House of Commons does
not exploit that weakness since "such an usurpation would be contrary to
the interest of the majority of its members."
7. Whether the British Government inclines more to Absolute Monarchy,
or to a Republic. This first appeared as essay 9 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741).
In this essay Hume argues that the British government is moving more towards
absolute monarchy. Although absolute tyranny is bad, a republic is worse
since factions will divide it and civil war will result. "This may teach
us the lesson of moderation in all our political controversies."
8. Of Parties in General. This first appeared as essay 10 in
EMP (Vol. 1, 1741). In this essay Hume condemns the institution of political
parties since "factions subvert government [and] render laws impotent".
Factions are either (1) personal, based on friendship and mere party loyalty,
or (2) real, based on genuine differences of interest, principle, or affection.
9. Of the Parties of Great Britain. This first appeared as essay
11 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741). In this essay Hume argues that the two main party
orientations in Great Britain are the court party and country party, divided
both in principle and in interest. According to Hume, established clergy
side with the court party, and dissenting clergy with the country; the
Round-heads sided with the country, the Cavalier with the court. Tories
and Whigs are harder to classify, especially since the revolution.
10. Of Superstition and Enthusiasm. This first appeared as essay
12 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741). In this essay Hume argues that superstition and
enthusiasm (fanaticism) are the main sources of false religion. He defends
the views that (1) superstition gives rise to priests and ceremonies, but
enthusiasm does not; (2) enthusiastic religions are more violent than superstitious
ones; and, (3) "superstition is an enemy to civil liberty, and enthusiasm
a friend to it."
11. Of the Dignity or Meanness of Human Nature. This first appeared
as essay 14 in EMP (Vol. 1, 1741) under the title "Of the Dignity of Human
Nature" and renamed in EMPL (1770). In this essay Hume argues that we are
more inclined towards morality if we hold an optimistic view of human nature
rather than a pessimistic one. He believes that many discussions of human
nature err by drawing faulty comparisons between humans and other species
above or below us. Hume criticises those who hold that all human actions
are selfish.
12. Of Civil Liberty. This first appeared as essay 15 in EMP
(Vol. 1, 1741) under the title "Of Liberty and Despotism" and renamed in
EMPL Part 1 (1758). In this essay Hume argues that arts and sciences flourish
under absolute governments, but commerce flourishes more in free governments.
Although all forms of government have recently improved, Hume believes
that monarchies have improved the most. Free governments tend to degenerate
because of excessive debts and taxes.
13. Of Eloquence. This first appeared as essay 2 in EMP (Vol.
2, 1742). In this essay Hume argues that ancient societies were superior
to modern societies in oratorical eloquence. Hume refutes commonly offered
reasons to explain the difference, such as the simplicity of ancient laws,
modern disdain for rhetorical tricks, and the severity of ancient crimes.
Hume concludes that modern orators should not mimic the ancient rhetorical
style, but stress philosophical argument as they do. However, some modern
style may be corrected.
14. Of the Rise and Progress of the Arts and Sciences. This first
appeared as essay 5 in EMP (Vol. 2, 1742). In this essay Hume argues that
the rise of arts and sciences is not a matter of chance but of definitive
causes. Hume observes four causes. First, arts and sciences first arise
only in free governments. Second, politeness and learning spread through
international commerce. Third, once established, a republic is most favourable
to sciences, and a civilised monarchy most favourable to arts. Fourth,
when arts and sciences decline in a country, they seldom revive in that
same country.
15. The Epicurean. This first appeared as essay 6 in EMP (Vol.
2, 1742). In this essay Hume poetically expresses the Epicurean view that
human happiness is found in pleasure.
16. The Stoic. This first appeared as essay 7 in EMP (Vol. 2,
1742). In this essay Hume starkly expresses the Stoic view of natural order
and finding happiness through honest and hard work.
17. The Platonist. This first appeared as essay 8 in EMP (Vol.
2, 1742). In this essay Hume expresses the Platonist view that happiness
is found in the contemplation of the most perfect object.
18. The Sceptic. This first appeared as essay 9 in EMP (Vol.
2, 1742). In this essay Hume expresses the Sceptical view that "no objects
are, in themselves, desirable or odious, valuable or despicable; but that
objects acquire these qualities from the particular character and constitution
of the mind, which surveys them." Philosophers assist in establishing a
larger context within which we may survey things.
19. Of Polygamy and Divorces. This first appeared as essay 10
in EMP (Vol. 2, 1742). In this essay Hume argues against both polygamy
and divorce. Polygamy is bad since it undermines intimate friendship and
promotes inequality and jealousy. Although voluntary divorce allows us
to retain a sense of liberty, it is bad because of its affects on children,
the "deadly hatred" that erupts at the prospect of separation, and the
insecurity that it generates for each partner.
20. Of Simplicity and Refinement in Writing. This first appeared
as essay 11 in EMP (Vol. 2, 1742) under the title "Of Simplicity and Refinement"
and renamed in EMP (1748). In this essay Hume argues that writing style
should neither be too natural, as in common conversation, nor too refined
or ornamented. He notes that writers have some latitude between these two
extremes, and that no rule can establish the best middle ground.
21. Of National Characters. This first appeared as essay 24 in
EMP (1748). In this essay Hume argues that the varying characteristics
of people in different countries owe principally to "moral causes" such
as governments, and very little to "physical causes" such as native food
and climate. He argues against physical causes by illustrating that two
specific societies in the same geographical conditions may have highly
diverse characteristics. Also, two societies in vastly different geographical
conditions may have similar characteristics. In the 1753 edition, Hume
included a controversial note arguing that blacks are inferior to whites.
22. Of Tragedy. This first appeared as dissertation 3 in FD (1757),
and later included as essay 25 of EMPL Part 1 (1758). In this essay Hume
discusses the psychological reasons why we feel pleasure when observing
artistic depictions of tragic events. Hume argues that "the energy of expression,
the power of numbers, and the charm of imitation" convey the sense of pleasure.
Hume particularly stresses the technical artistry involved when an artistic
work imitates the original.
23. Of the Standard of Taste. This first appeared as dissertation
4 in FD (1757), and later included as essay 26 of EMPL Part 1 (1758). In
this essay Hume argues that there is a uniform sense of artistic judgment
in human nature, similar to our uniform sense of moral judgment. Specific
objects consistently trigger feelings of beauty within us, as our human
nature dictates. Just as we can refine our external senses such as our
palate, we can also refine our sense of artistic beauty and thus cultivate
a delicacy of taste. In spite of this uniform standard of taste, two factors
create some difference in our judgments: "the one is the different humours
of particular men; the other, the particular manners and opinions of our
age and country."
PART 2
1. Of Commerce. This first appeared as essay 1 in PD (1752).
This essay is an introduction to the essays that follow. Hume argues that
a country's happiness and military strength both depend on strong industry.
In time of peace excess workers can produce luxuries and improve the arts,
and thus increase a country's happiness. In time of war, excess workers
can serve in the military. Hume argues further that foreign trade also
increases happiness and strengthens the military. Foreign trade acquaints
people with the pleasures of foreign luxuries and thus raises the quality
of life. Foreign trade also increases industry, which strengthens the labour
pool for possible use in the military.
2. Of Refinement in the Arts. This first appeared as essay 2 in
PD (1752) under the title "Of Luxury" and renamed in EMPL Part 2 (1760).
In this essay Hume argues that private and public happiness increases with
the growth of cultural refinement in the arts and sciences. Hume also notes
that when people are lazy and indifferent to other people, then luxury
is harmful to political society.
3. Of Money. This first appeared as essay 3 in PD (1752). In
this essay Hume argues that the wealth of a country consists of its labour
and commodities, not in the quantity of its gold or silver. For Hume, an
increase or decrease of money in a country does not increase or decrease
the country's wealth. As the quantity of money increases or decreases,
the prices of both labour and products increase and decrease proportionally.
However, Hume argues that the overall economy suffers when prices increase
because of an increase in money; for, when prices are higher, domestic
industries cannot compete with cheaper foreign labour and products. For
this reason, Hume sees a danger in paper credit; for, when banks issue
credit, this increases the quantity of money in a country, which in turn
raises prices, which in turn again makes domestic products less competitive.
4. Of Interest. This first appeared as essay 4 in PD (1752).
In this essay Hume argues against the mercantilist view that an increase
of money in a country will result in lower interest. Hume notes again that
increased money will only result in higher labour and commodity prices.
For Hume, interest rates change based on three factors: the demand for
borrowing, the amount of money brought together to supply borrowers, and
the high or low profits arising from commerce.
5. Of the Balance of Trade. This first appeared as essay 5 in
PD (1752). In this essay Hume argues against the mercantilist fear of losing
gold through buying foreign imports. Instead, he proposes what is now known
as Hume's gold-flow theory: the balance of trade between countries will
ultimately attain equilibrium, and that a country cannot permanently lose
its wealth by purchasing too many foreign imports. Hume's reasoning is
that, if a country loses money, then prices will drop within that country;
this, in turn will make the country's exports more competitive and enable
it to bring in new money from foreign countries. This is similar to how
fluids in interconnected chambers will always remain at the same level:
when fluid is removed from one chamber, it will draw on the fluids in other
chambers. For Hume, if we "suppose four-fifths of all the money in Great
Britain to be annihilated in one night," then prices would drop, exports
would increase, and new money for their purchase would enter the country.
6. Of the Jealousy of Trade. This first appeared as essay 6 in
EMPL (1760). In this essay Hume argues against the mercantilist fear that
national wealth is hurt when foreign neighbours prosper. For Hume, a nation
will typically prosper only when its neighbouring countries do too. For,
a nation's export industry will decline unless its foreign neighbour has
enough money to purchase the exports.
7. Of the Balance of Power. This first appeared as essay 6 in
PD (1752). In this essay Hume argues that the notion of a balance of power
among foreign governments is not a modern invention but practised in ancient
times.
8. Of Taxes. This first appeared as essay 7 in PD (1752). In
this essay Hume argues that, to an extent, workers can cover increased
taxes by increasing their labour, rather than by receiving an increase
to their wages. This is parallel to situations in which workers in some
countries increase their labour to overcome natural disadvantages such
as harsh climate. Hume argues that it is best to tax luxury items, rather
than necessities, since the purchase of luxuries is to some extent voluntary.
9. Of Public Credit. This first appeared as essay 8 in PD (1752).
In this essay Hume describes several unfavourable economic consequences
of Britain's national debt, and he warns of a forthcoming national bankruptcy.
The worse consequence is that perhaps at some time the interests of millions
of creditors may be sacrificed for the benefit of a smaller number of debtors.
But even if disaster strikes, Hume argues that people will forget this
tragedy and once again engage in risky credit practices.
10. Of some Remarkable Customs. This first appeared as essay
9 in PD (1752). In this essay Hume discusses three peculiar political practices.
First, as a rule, legislators must be free to discuss and prose any law,
without fear of punishment. However, in ancient Athens, the judiciary could
punish legislators if the judiciary determined that the enacted law was
unjust. Second, as a rule, a government cannot have two legislative bodies
with equal power, with no checks on each other. However, Roman legislature
had two legislative bodies of this sort. Third, as a rule, laws enacted
by a magistrate are friendlier to liberty than laws enacted through violence.
However, an exception to this is the Royally-backed practice in Great Britain
of forcefully conscripting sailors; more liberty would in fact result from
a violent usurpation of this law.
11. Of the Populousness of Ancient Nations. This first appeared
as essay 10 in PD (1752) and is the longest of Hume's essays. Contrary
to the views of Isaac Vossius, Montesquieu and others, Hume argues that
the world is more populated in modern times than it was in ancient. Hume
argues that the widespread practice of slavery in the ancient world curbed
population growth. Wars were frequent and especially devastating to population.
Agriculture in the ancient world was primitive and could not support a
great population. Hume examines the population numbers given by various
ancient historians and argues that some especially high figures are inaccurate
exaggerations.
12. Of the Original Contract. This first appeared as essay 25
in EMP (1748) and was moved to EMPL Part 2 (1758). In this essay Hume discusses
the philosophical differences between the Tory and Whig parties as concerns
the origin of government. Hume briefly notes and agrees with the Tory argument
for political authority from divine right. Against the Whig argument for
political authority from the original contract, Hume argues that when we
examine revolutions that establish governments, we find violence, and not
contractual agreement. In fact, people are in least agreement when forming
of new governments. Hume also argues that moral duties are either natural
(based on instinct) or artificial (based on the necessities of society).
Political allegiance is artificial and ultimately based on "the general
interests or necessities of society".
13. Of Passive Obedience. This first appeared as essay 26 in
EMP (1748) and moved to EMPL Part 2 (1758). In this essay Hume discusses
the practical differences between the Tory and Whig parties as concerns
the doctrine of passive obedience, that is, the unlawfulness of armed uprising
against the King's authority. Contrary to the Tories, Hume argues that
resistance is justified in extraordinary emergencies "when the public is
in the highest danger, from violence and tyranny". However, Hume opposes
the Whig view that resistance is justified as a check to the power given
to the sovereign in the British constitution.
14. Of the Coalition of Parties. This first appeared as essay
14 in EMPL (1760). In this essay Hume discusses the historical issues that
led to the differences between the Whig and Tory parties, particularly
at the outbreak of the British civil war. Hume argues that the popular
party's position was better founded than the Royalist party's position,
but that the Royalist position had law on its side. Hume argues that political
moderation is now required to bring coalition to the Whig and Tory parties.
15. Of the Protestant Succession. This first appeared as essay
11 in PD (1752). In 1701 the English Parliament passed the Act of Settlement,
which prevented the continuation of the Roman Catholic Stuart dynasty in
the line of royal succession, and established instead the Protestant Hanover
dynasty. The Act specified that the monarch must belong to the Anglican
Church. In this essay Hume lists the advantages and disadvantages of the
shift to the Protestant monarchy that must have weighed in the minds of
the Parliamentarians prior to the Act. Hume concludes that, on balance,
the best choice was that in favour of the Protestant Hanover dynasty. This
essay was originally intended for inclusion in the 1748 edition of Essays,
Moral and Political, but was suppressed at the judgment of his friend
Charles Erskine. The essay was especially controversial in view of recent
political events. In 1745 Scottish Jacobites launched a rebellion hoping
to restore the Stuart family by supporting the Young Pretender, Charles
Edward Stuart. The rebellion failed, and several Scottish Jacobites were
imprisoned or executed.
16. Idea of a Perfect Commonwealth. This first appeared as essay
12 in PD (1752). In this essay Hume presents his conception of the most
ideal plan of government, modelled after the Dutch government. Hume divides
the country into 100 counties, and each county into 100 parishes. People
in each parish elect a representative for their county. These representatives
then elect magistrates and senators from their county to be the whole executive
power of the commonwealth in the capital. The senators elect magistrates
to cover specific tasks, such as councils of religion and learning, of
trade, and of laws. Hume describes voting procedures and re-election policies.
Military service is voluntary and all crimes are tried in the county by
magistrates and a jury. Hume describes policies that ensure that party
factions do not disrupt unity.
REMOVED ESSAYS
1. Of Essay Writing. This first appeared as essay 1 in EMP
(Vol. 2, 1742) and was removed in EMP (1748). In a letter to Charles Erskine
(February 13, 1748) Hume writes that he removed this and the next two essays
for being "frivolous & finical". In this essay Hume argues that the
intellectual world of people is divided between those of learning and those
of conversation. Hume expresses hope that his Essays will help bridge
the gap.
2. Of Moral Prejudices. This first appeared as essay 3 in EMP
(Vol. 2, 1742) and was removed in EMP (1748). In this essay Hume argues
against those that ridicule accepted moral and social standards. Hume advises
"not to depart too far from the receiv'd Maxims of Conduct and Behaviour,
by a refin'd Search after Happiness or Perfection."
3. Of the Middle Station of Life. This first appeared as essay
4 in EMP (Vol. 2, 1742) and was removed in EMP (1748). In this essay Hume
argues that the best position in life is a middle rank, since the rich
are too immersed in pleasure and the poor struggle for necessities. The
middle position provides the best opportunity to acquire virtue, wisdom,
and happiness.
4. Of Impudence and Modesty. This first appeared as essay 3 in
EMP (Vol. 1, 1741) and was removed in EMPL (1764). In this essay Hume argues
that, although impudence is a vice, it often has the effects of being a
virtue insofar as it increases one's prosperity. Unlike other vices, which
are easy to acquire, true impudence is hard to acquire.
5. Of Love and Marriage. This first appeared as essay 6 in EMP
(Vol. 1, 1741) and was removed in EMPL (1764). Hume notes in a letter to
Adam Smith (September 24, 1752) his desire to remove this and the next
essay in the 1753 edition for being "too frivolous for the rest"; however,
Hume's bookseller, Andrew Millar, protested. In this essay Hume points
out the fundamental source of tension in marriage: desire for security
vs. desire for immediate pleasure. Hume makes his point by extending Aristophanes'
allegory in Plato's Symposium.
6. Of the Study of History. This first appeared as essay 7 in
EMP (Vol. 1, 1741) and was removed in EMPL (1764). In this essay Hume explains
some advantages of studying history. It offers entertainment by transporting
us to a remote age; it makes us sophisticated; it extends our limited experience
to all past ages. Also, the historian invariably emphasises virtue and
denounces vice.
7. Of Avarice. This first appeared as essay 13 in EMP (Vol. 1,
1741) and was removed in EMPL (1770). In this essay Hume argues that, although
writers commonly exaggerate depictions of vices in people, avarice is a
vice that is difficult to exaggerate. Avarice seems to be restricted to
old men with cold tempers. Because this vice is difficult to reverse, Hume
thinks that it is best criticised through satire, rather than serious admonishing.
8. A Character of Sir Robert Walpole. This first appeared as
essay 12 in EMP (Vol. 2, 1742); in EMP (1748) the essay was moved to a
note in "That Politics may be reduced to a Science", and in EMPL (1770)
this note was entirely removed. In this essay Hume argues that most depictions
of Prime Minister Robert Walpole are biased; accordingly, Hume presents
a balanced list of his virtues and vices. He concludes noting, "As I am
a man, I love him; as I am a scholar, I hate him; as I am a Briton, I calmly
wish his fall."
3. Overview of the Early Responses
Hume began composing his first essays around 1739 and sent several essays
to Henry Home Lord Kames for comments. The first volume of Hume's Essays,
Moral and Political appeared in 1741, and Hume notes in his autobiography
that "the work was favourably received, and soon made me entirely forget
my former disappointment"(i.e., the failure of the Treatise). Shortly
after Volume 1 appeared, an unidentified respondent sent Hume a list of
29 remarks on various essays in the volume. Hume incorporated the bulk
of the recommendations into later editions of his Essays. Previously
overlooked by Hume scholars, a transcription of the manuscript appears
in print here for the first time. In 1742 Robert Walpole resigned as British
Prime Minister, and Hume's essay "A Character of Sir Robert Walpole" was
reprinted in various British newspapers. In one of these papers the editor
posed several questions that Hume's essay did not address. Hume responded
in the Scots Magazine with answers to these questions. In a letter
to Henry Home around this time, Hume notes the success of his Essays:
The Essays are all sold in London; as I am inform'd by two Letters
from English Gentlemen of my Acquaintaince. There is a Demand for them;
& as one of them tells me, Innys the great Bookseller in Paul's Church
Yard wonders there is not a new Edition, for that he cannot find Copies
for his Customers. I am also told that Dr Butler has every where recommended
them. So that I hope they will have some Success. [Hume to Kames, June
13, 1742]
In 1748 Hume published the third edition of his Essays; he comments
in a letter on his reasons for discarding some of the earlier essays:
You must know, that Andrew Millar is printing a new Edition of certain
Essays, that have been ascrib'd to me; and as I threw out some, that seem'd
frivolous & finical, I was resolv'd to supply their Place by others,
that shou'd be more instructive. [Hume to Charles Erskine, February 13,
1748]
It appears that for almost 10 years no responses to Hume's Essays
were published. Around 1750 Hume became more generally known, largely from
controversy surrounding "Of Miracles" in his Philosophical Essays
(1748). Perhaps because of this fame, Hume's Essays received more
critical attention. In 1751 John Brown criticised a minor point in Hume's
essay "Of the Dignity or Meanness of Human Nature". The next year, in preparing
a new edition of the Essays, Hume wrote to Adam Smith soliciting
comments. Also that year, Hume's Political Discourses appeared,
which he describes in his autobiography as "the only work of mine that
was successful on the first publication. It was well received abroad and
at home." The work was favourably reviewed in the Monthly Review
(1752), and several essays in that work quickly became the subject of discussion.
Hume's essay "Of the Populousness of Ancient Nations" drew much attention
for its view that the ancient world was less populated than the modern
world. In 1753 Hume's friend Robert Wallace argued for the opposite view,
and presented a 150 page critique of Hume's argument. Marquis de Mirabeau
also criticised Hume's position (1755). Adam Ferguson discussed a minor
point in the essay (1767), and Marquis de Chastellux defended Hume's position
against Wallace (1772). Although agreeing with Hume's conclusion, Thomas
Malthus criticised Hume's method of analysing the issue (1798).
Several writers discussed Hume's economic essays in detail, especially
Hume's essays "Of Money" and "Of the Balance of Trade". In 1750 Hume received
a long critical letter on manuscripts of these essays from James Oswald
of Dunnikier. Published responses were by Robert Wallace (1758), James
Steuart-Denham (1767), Josiah Tucker (1774), and Adam Smith (1776). Discussions
on Hume's economic theories continued in the early 19th century
by John Weatley (1803, 1807), David Ricardo (1815), and Dugald Stewart
(1855). Hume's essay "Of National Characters" also drew attention. Hume's
attack on the clergy in that essay was criticised by Alexander Gerard (1760),
Robert Wallace, and John Ogilvie (1783). James Beattie (1770) and François
Xavier Swediauer (1786) attacked Hume's statement in that essay about the
inferiority of Blacks. William Godwin (1793) drew heavily on Hume's examples
in "Of National Characters".
In 1757 Hume's Four Dissertations appeared, which contained two
essays on aesthetic theory. In the reviews of this work, the aesthetic
essays were favourably received. For example, the Literary Magazine
says concerning "Of Tragedy" that "What the author adds from himself
is very beautiful" and that "Mr. Hume's fourth essay concerning
the standard of taste, is very elegant and entertaining" (1757, Vol. 2).
Richard Hurd responded to "Of Tragedy" in 1757, although the definitive
critique of that essay appeared twenty years later in George Campbell's
Philosophy of Rhetoric (1776). Dugald Stewart also discussed the
essay (1810). Alexander Gerard (1780) critically discussed Hume's essay
"Of the Standard of Taste".
By the middle of the 19th century, writers in aesthetic,
political, and economic theory no longer drew from Hume as they did earlier.
From then on, discussions of Hume's views principally appeared in historical
surveys, such as those by Leslie Stephen (1876) and John Kells Ingram (1888).
|
